<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Zero Income Tax</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fleeced.wordpress.com/2007/05/11/zero-income-tax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fleeced.wordpress.com/2007/05/11/zero-income-tax/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:52:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jono</title>
		<link>http://fleeced.wordpress.com/2007/05/11/zero-income-tax/#comment-401</link>
		<dc:creator>Jono</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 04:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fleeced.wordpress.com/2007/05/11/zero-income-tax/#comment-401</guid>
		<description>Yep, its exactly this focus that needs to be pushed when looking at a party&#039;s policies and budget.

Not the vague and mysterious &quot;future test&quot; that Kevin Rudd and Julia Gillard use to endorse any amount of government spending proposed by the ALP, and condemn any government spending OR tax-cut proposed by the Liberals.

How about a size of government test ? 
$4.7 billion towards broadband - FAIL.
$5 billion towards an education endowment fund - FAIL
One off payments for elderly and pensioners - FAIL
One off payments for carers - FAIL
Billions in subsidies for solar energy - FAIL
Billions in subsidies for water tanks - FAIL

The only policy that would get a tick of approval with this focus in mind would be tax cuts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, its exactly this focus that needs to be pushed when looking at a party&#8217;s policies and budget.</p>
<p>Not the vague and mysterious &#8220;future test&#8221; that Kevin Rudd and Julia Gillard use to endorse any amount of government spending proposed by the ALP, and condemn any government spending OR tax-cut proposed by the Liberals.</p>
<p>How about a size of government test ?<br />
$4.7 billion towards broadband &#8211; FAIL.<br />
$5 billion towards an education endowment fund &#8211; FAIL<br />
One off payments for elderly and pensioners &#8211; FAIL<br />
One off payments for carers &#8211; FAIL<br />
Billions in subsidies for solar energy &#8211; FAIL<br />
Billions in subsidies for water tanks &#8211; FAIL</p>
<p>The only policy that would get a tick of approval with this focus in mind would be tax cuts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pommygranate</title>
		<link>http://fleeced.wordpress.com/2007/05/11/zero-income-tax/#comment-386</link>
		<dc:creator>pommygranate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 10:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fleeced.wordpress.com/2007/05/11/zero-income-tax/#comment-386</guid>
		<description>fleeced

this sort of wonderful analysis will register with the voters.   need more of these simple statements</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fleeced</p>
<p>this sort of wonderful analysis will register with the voters.   need more of these simple statements</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
